FT Logo

Copy article

FT Editor Banner

How can the rest of us cope when the richest are struggling?

Journalist: Tom Dunstan, FTAdviser

ended 02. February 2024

Recently, we have seen more and more people stating that they are unable to afford their mortgage due to increased rates and increased payments.

A recent example has been former science minister who, due to personal financial obligations, has been unable to afford his increased mortgage payments despite being on nearly £120,000 per annumn.

If some of the richest in our society can't afford their mortgage payments, what does this mean for those struggling with their mortgage payments on an average, or even below average wage?

Could this act as a catalyst for government action to address this issue? What would you like to see happen?

13 responses from the Newspage community

Copy all

Copy

Some may argue that the richest in our society will have larger mortgages and therefore face bigger hikes in monthly payments. However it is all relative.

A £1200 jump for the ex minister is a significant increase, but in real terms it is no worse than a £200 jump to someone on a very low income. Whilst the numbers are different, the anguish is the same.

Government intervention would be welcome and it cant come quick enough. Especially for the general public because not everyone has the option to quit a £118,000 job in order to get something better paying.
Copy

This just shows the disparity between politicians and Joe public. Instead of looking after his constituency, he has jumped ship from possibly the only position he had where he was able to apply pressure on getting these rates down. It smacks of selfishness and is what we all expect from a Tory MP in modern times.
Copy

This is a true testemant showing that many people, live to their financial limits. Higher earners have bigger mortgages, are more comfortable with high unsecured debt levels, raised lifestyles and faster cars. Interest rate increases can easily translate into larger monetary amounts for borrowers with higher debt, and they can also tip over the edge just as quickly as lower income earners. It's all relative, but the same situation and same life choices, regardless of income.
Copy

While individuals like the former science minister might still have financial safety nets, their situation serves as a cautionary tale. It emphasizes that even relatively high incomes can become stretched by significant mortgage increases, especially if combined with other debts or financial obligations.
For those with lower incomes, the situation is likely much more precarious. Higher mortgage payments might translate to difficult choices between essential expenses, potentially leading to financial hardship or even homeownership insecurity. I call for the Government to intervene and request a rate freeze on high street lenders variable rates - these should be capped in line with the BOE base rate, as an emergency measure, and also offer extended terms on the mortgage charter from 6m to 12m.
Copy

While it's understandable there's concern about rising mortgage rates, it's important to offer some perspective.

Firstly, yes, rate rises are putting pressure on some borrowers, and that's never ideal. However, it's crucial to note that historical context matters. Compared to the past two decades, current interest rates remain relatively low. After the 2008 housing market bubble, regulations tightened significantly, making the UK property market far less leveraged than it once was. This inherently reduces systemic risk.

The situation you referenced, while unfortunate, highlights the importance of individual financial prudence. High earners aren't immune to overextending themselves or making risky financial decisions. This instance doesn't necessarily reflect broader market instability. Remember, responsible investing always requires a buffer for unforeseen expenses.

Government may act, but unlikely drastic. Current support focuses on affected, especially low-income households.
Copy

To hear that a politician has given up politics as he can't afford the increase in his mortgage costs on an income of £120,000 is laughable. Apparently, his mortgage increase was to a monthly figure of £2,000 and he has now gone and got a job to be able to support this instead - somehow I don't think he was ever going to be lined up as chancellor with that inability to budget his life.
Copy

The extortionate cost of living has been an issue long before the inflation crisis hit. But it's made infinitely worse by corporate greed. We see it in everything from supermarkets hiding behind inflation to overprice goods, motorway service stations ripping off consumers at the petrol pumps and food counters, to coffee shop chains using oversized cups as standard to justify their ridiculous prices.

But worse of all is the insanely high cost of housing, a result of decades of governments of all stripes turning a blind eye to ever-increasing house prices outstripping wage growth. Now the chickens are coming home to roost, as high mortgage rates coupled with high house prices threaten to blow up the economy, drive many into homelessness, and reduce living standards even further.

What would I like to see? Policy decisions taken in the interests of people rather than corporate avarice would be a great start.
Copy

Ultimately, addressing this issue requires a multi-faceted approach that combines short-term relief with long-term solutions. Increasingly I am noticing that things don't add up. Whether it be people not being able to afford to keep a roof over their heads, those who have created a lifestyle that is like a hungry monster that can never be full, to those who will never be able to spend all that they have. Living in a society where consumerism is like a plague, alongside an economy that does not add up anymore, is worrying. We need to take control of what we can control, look at our finances straight in the eye, and know that if we really can't cope after making all the changes that are available to us in the timeframe given, then all we can do is hold our hands up and say - sorry there is no more fuel in the tank. I can't pay. It seems that there will be more and more of us in that situation, so sooner or later, something will have to give.
Copy

If those at the top are feeling the squeeze, what hope is there for ordinary folks who are barely making ends meet? It's a sobering thought that hits close to home for many who are already grappling with the burden of mortgage payments on modest incomes.

This situation should indeed serve as a wake-up call for government action. We need policies that prioritise housing affordability for all, not just the privileged few. It's time for solutions that ensure everyone has a fair shot at owning a home without sacrificing their financial security.

I'd like to see measures put in place to ease the burden of mortgage payments, such as income-based assistance or more affordable housing options. It's imperative that our leaders address this today.
Copy

Regardless of wealth, the majority of people have been impacted with increased mortgage rates. We have seen a number of wealthier customers reduce spending due to increased mortgage costs. Although it doesnt impact high net worth people as much, they have still had to scale back.

For some, they might be weighing up whether to sell their holiday home, downsize or even have a closer look at other expenses such as school fees. It is not unusual for families to have school fees in excess of £50,000 per annum.
Copy

It all comes down to an individual's personal financial situation, specifically, the number of monthly credit commitments, responsibilities like child maintenance or school fees. In essence, the key consideration is your net disposable monthly income and your ability to absorb rising costs and potential interest rate hikes.
Copy

I think we need to step away from short-term sticking plasters. Whilst no one wants to see a crash, house prices increasing by more than wages ad-infinitum isn't sustainable and serves no-one but the money men. Rate rises have inflicted a whole lot of pain but we need a proper, government led plan to provide enough houses over the next 10 years and a housing minister in post for more than 18 months at a time.

The mindset is perfectly summed up by the staggering that the government spent £40 billion supporting energy bill payments then criticises the opposition for wanting to spend less on a green programme to make sure it doesn't happen again. Where is the long term planning for anything?

Or do we follow the money to see what vested interests in the status quo just so happen to make hefty policitical donations?
Copy

We would certainly hope that the closer the cost of living crisis gets to those so far from the poverty line, some action will be taken.

However, a few tax breaks or other short-term measures being introduced, regrettably will probably make next to no difference to those living on or even below the poverty line. Those at the top of the iceberg, whose earnings are way above most of the population, should not be in line for the most help.

Citizens of our country who are going hungry, going cold, going into dangerous debt and unable to afford mortgages or rent payments are the people who need to benefit from any government intervention. It’s very unpopular to say, but it should also start with single parents (mostly mums). Women are disproportionately suffering in all areas of policy-making.