Over 1.7 million claiming unemployment benefits – up by 30,000 in September
By Douglas Patient ·
The number of people claiming unemployment benefits stood at 1.701 million in September, up by around 30,000 from the previous month, UK unemployment data shows.
This was the highest level since April 2025 and the largest monthly increase since July 2024.
Meanwhile, the UK unemployment rate fell by 0.1 percentage points both on the quarter and the year, to 4.7%.
Experts told Newspage that the rise in benefit claimants, alongside falling vacancies, suggests employers are becoming more reluctant to recruit even though the headline unemployment rate has edged down.
They blamed a combination of higher employment costs, business taxes and the growing use of AI.
Several called on the government to use the Budget to reduce the cost of hiring and encourage businesses to invest, expand and create jobs.
Amelia Brooke, Career Coach at Amelia Brooke Career Vision, said employees need to be prepared and aware of changes in their industries.
She added: “My advice is to be prepared. Stay updated with changes within and outside your company and sector.”
How many people are claiming unemployment benefits?
Rupert Collingwood, Founder at The London Broker, said: “If you tax work and jobs, put barriers up for employers to hire, while you pay people not to work, in an age of AI workers and outsourcing these numbers are inevitable.”
Martin Rayner, Financial Adviser at Compton Financial Services, said the figures are a warning sign.
He added: "Every household understands a simple rule. If costs rise, you either earn more or spend less. The government seems determined to avoid that choice. The latest jobs figures are another warning sign. Businesses are facing higher taxes and employment costs, making them increasingly reluctant to recruit.
"We risk a vicious circle. Higher unemployment means less tax revenue and more spending on benefits. The government then raises taxes to plug the gap, potentially costing even more jobs. What the Budget needs to deliver and what it actually delivers may be two very different things.
“The government needs to tackle both income and spending, but the only sustainable solution is economic growth. That means encouraging businesses to invest, expand and employ people, rather than treating them as an endless source of tax revenue. You cannot tax your way to prosperity while destroying the jobs that fund it.”
Michelle Lawson, Director at Fareham-based Lawson Financial, said she is worried about what the Budget will bring.
She added: "Gloomy news for a gloomy day. Not surprising figures at all. Sadly, the cost of living, the cost of doing business, the cost of employing staff and the cost-saving impact of AI are really starting to bite.
“Labour’s historic actions haven’t been the best and people wait with bated breath for the upcoming Budget where people are already anticipating and fearing the worst but hoping for the best. Prepare for pockets to be raided further and for this economic crisis to worsen.”
Why are employers reluctant to hire?
Samuel Mather-Holgate, Managing Director & IFA at Swindon-based Mather and Murray Financial, said AI is reshaping employment.
He added: "The headline unemployment rate may have fallen, but scratch beneath the surface and Britain’s jobs market is flashing warning signs. Another 30,000 people claiming unemployment benefits and vacancies falling to 691,000 suggest businesses are increasingly reluctant to hire.
"AI is changing the jobs market, but piling higher employment taxes on businesses risks accelerating the squeeze on workers. The increase in employers’ National Insurance has made taking someone on more expensive at precisely the wrong time. The Budget should address that cost directly.
“Cutting employers’ National Insurance would reduce the price of creating jobs and give smaller firms more room to recruit. You cannot tax job creation more heavily and then be surprised when businesses create fewer jobs. AI may be reshaping employment, but government policy shouldn’t make hiring humans the expensive option.”
Copy story









