Muchas moola for alerting HMRC to tax evasion
One question: what are your thoughts on HMRC paying people a load of dosh to report tax evaders? Fair dinkum, as they will almost all be UHNWs, corporates, etc — or ever so slightly un-British?
Copy article
4 responses from the Newspage communityCopy all
Copy all
Copy
It was only a matter of time before we cottoned on to this practice that has been very successful in other countries. With Rachel searching the sofa for every penny to plug her hole or give herself more headroom, some people will have a moral dilemma of earning a few quid or snitching.
Copy
A “nark’s charter.” HMRC’s “Tax Evasion Hotline” with its contractual informants programme that will literally pay rewarded informants, sometimes hundreds of thousands or even millions if the tip yields serious revenue. is defended on pure cost-benefit grounds, as in theory, one decent whistleblower inside a big offshore structure or a multinational’s tax-avoidance team can bring in tens or hundreds of millions that HMRC would never spot otherwise. In practice, I fear a lot of time and cost is going to be wasted on a lot of spurious investigations as disgruntled ex-employees, embittered ex-spouses, sacked advisers nursing a grudge will dobb their targets in exaggerated, malicious or outright vindictive tip-offs which HMRC will have to sift through.
Copy
Ooh, what a potential Brucey bonus. As Rachel Reeves claws for more taxes like Hans Gruber hanging from Holly’s wristwatch atop Nakatomi Plaza, she plays masterfully to the nation’s “it’s not fair” brigade; the snide, green-eyed monsters. It’s the ultimate snitch-bait, perfectly tailored to the British love of quiet, righteous tattling.
Copy
HMRC’s plan risks turning taxpayers into bounty hunters, and that cannot happen without strong safeguards. Rewards for reporting tax evasion may help uncover wrongdoing among the ultra-wealthy and big corporates, but there is a serious issue being ignored. What protections exist for individuals or businesses who could be hit with false or malicious reports?
We only need to look at the whistleblowing system to see the danger. People can quite literally make things up, drag others through lengthy processes and even into court with little or no evidence. The emotional and reputational damage from that sort of behaviour is enormous, and once financial incentives are involved the risks grow even further.
HMRC says it reviews information carefully, but the public deserves clarity on how baseless claims are filtered and what support exists for those wrongly accused. If we are turning taxpayers into bounty
We only need to look at the whistleblowing system to see the danger. People can quite literally make things up, drag others through lengthy processes and even into court with little or no evidence. The emotional and reputational damage from that sort of behaviour is enormous, and once financial incentives are involved the risks grow even further.
HMRC says it reviews information carefully, but the public deserves clarity on how baseless claims are filtered and what support exists for those wrongly accused. If we are turning taxpayers into bounty