About to lose your dream home? The little-known bridging loan that could save the deal

For homeowners caught in a stalled property chain or facing a seller's tight completion deadline, experts told Newspage a bridging loan could get your dream home over the line.

However, it's essential to understand the costs, terms and conditions before taking out a bridging loan.

Used in the right circumstances, with a realistic repayment plan and a clear financial benefit, it could be the difference between losing your dream home and finally getting the keys.

How can bridging finance help borrowers?

A bridging loan can help borrowers fund renovations and help secure purchases that might otherwise be out of reach, according to one expert.

Tony Sanchez, Founder at Bridging Loan Directory, commented: “Calling bridging finance an expensive last resort overlooks why someone might use it. It can help secure a purchase or fund work that makes a property suitable for a mortgage. The useful question is whether the total cost makes sense for what the borrower needs to achieve. 

"But getting the money is only half the job. There needs to be a realistic repayment plan from the outset. We should judge these loans by the whole outcome: what they enabled, what they cost and whether the borrower repaid them as intended.”

When is bridging the right tool for the job?

Borrowers must weigh up the costs carefully and have a clear exit strategy before considering a bridging loan.

Nouran Moustafa, Practice Principal & IFA at Roxton Wealth, commented: “Bridging finance has an unfair reputation for being a last resort. Sometimes it’s precisely what makes a property transaction possible. Imagine securing a property significantly below market value because the seller needs completion within weeks. A traditional mortgage might take too long, while bridging could secure the purchase. But the numbers must work. A £200,000 bridge at 0.75% monthly interest costs £1,500 per month before fees.

“Over six months, that’s £9,000 in interest alone, assuming the full balance remains outstanding. The biggest misconception is that bridging is inherently bad. It isn’t. Borrowing without a credible repayment strategy is. I would discourage bridging where a conventional mortgage, further advance or other suitable funding could achieve the same outcome at lower cost. My rule is simple: bridging should solve a temporary problem, not create a permanent financial one. A successful bridge isn’t one that completes quickly. It’s one that exits successfully.”

How can homebuyers plan for the full cost?

Homebuyers in England face a cost beyond the lender’s interest and fees, which should always be taken into consideration. 

Harvey Dhillon, Founder & CEO at Zmartly, commented: “The idea that bridging is only a last resort for people in trouble is misleading, but the worry about its cost still stands. Buying your next home before the old one sells can be a planned move, and a bridge is one way to pay for it. For a home buyer in England, though, the cost goes beyond the interest and fees. 

"A bridge lets you buy before you sell, so you’ll still own the old home at the end of completion day. That means paying the extra stamp duty on the new home, and your solicitor will usually send it to HMRC on the day you complete. You only get it back if the old home is sold within a time limit and you claim the refund in time. So it’s a mistake to price a bridge on the lender’s charges alone. Count the extra stamp duty as cash you’ll need on the day, and don’t complete until you know both deadlines.”

How can investors make the numbers work?

A bridging loan should be judged on how it’s repaid, not how fast it completes, according to Dariusz Karpowicz, Director at Doncaster-based Albion Financial Advice.

He commented: “Expensive does not mean desperate when you use bridging finance. New borrowers regularly underestimate the true price. Borrowing £200,000 at a monthly 0.75% rate racks up £9,000 in interest across six months, excluding arrangement fees. 

"Property investors must factor this expense into their initial figures. When a vendor requires completion within weeks and accepts 20% under market value, your margin easily covers the finance. Unless you hold pure cash, bridging often remains your sole option. Pair the loan with a guaranteed exit strategy and it works brilliantly. Lack that exit, and you face the priciest accidental mortgage imaginable.”

What makes a bridging loan a success?

One expert says the strongest bridging case starts with a credible exit, not just an urgent deadline.

Tracey Dixon, Buy-to-Let Mortgage Specialist & Owner at Cardiff-based Pure Mortgage and Protection, commented: “A bridging loan should buy you time, not buy you a bigger problem. Bridging can be a useful tool when a property needs work before it qualifies for a standard mortgage, or a purchase must complete before sale proceeds become available. Calling it an expensive last resort overlooks situations where it serves a clear purpose. But completing the purchase is only half the story. 

"The real test is whether the borrower can repay the bridge, on time, at an acceptable overall cost. ‘We’ll refinance later’ needs evidence behind it: lender criteria, affordability and a realistic valuation. Interest, fees and the cost of delays all need to be included. If a standard mortgage or a negotiated extension can achieve the same outcome more cheaply, those options deserve serious consideration. The strongest bridging case starts with a credible exit, not just an urgent deadline.”

Liam Buckler

Liam Buckler

Deputy Head of News, Newspage

Liam Buckler is Deputy Head of News at Newspage. He is a fully qualified multimedia journalist with experience across local and national media, and was a senior journalist at the Daily Mirror, where he helped launch Mirror US and covered news and current affairs.

The raw alert

The question we put to Newspage’s experts, and their answers.

Show the original alert and 5 responses

Are bridging loans always an expensive last resort?

ended 05. November 2026

Are bridging loans always an expensive last resort?

Bridging finance is often associated with high costs and borrowers under pressure. But what about cases where short-term funding enables a purchase, pays for improvements or solves a temporary funding gap?

Shawbrook has provided a £271,000 bridging loan that released equity from an existing property to fund the deposit on another purchase. It completed three working days before the borrower’s deadline. One borrower described it as having “saved our purchase”.

Bridging Loan Directory is seeking practical examples that help explain when bridging finance is worth its cost  and when another option would serve the borrower better.

Questions for Newspagers

  1. Can you share a case where bridging achieved a useful outcome that another available funding option could not? What would have happened without it?
  2. What did the borrowing cost overall, how long was it needed, and how was it repaid? Please distinguish completed exits from planned repayments.
  3. Which perceptions of bridging are outdated or misleading, and which concerns remain justified?
  4. When have you advised someone against bridging because a cheaper or more suitable option was available?

5 responses from the Newspage community

Copy all

Story Source
Copy

Pro
Tony SanchezVerified
Founder at Bridging Loan Directory
iContact details are shown to logged-in members. Log in
Calling bridging finance an expensive last resort overlooks why someone might use it. It can help secure a purchase or fund work that makes a property suitable for a mortgage. The useful question is whether the total cost makes sense for what the borrower needs to achieve.

“But getting the money is only half the job. There needs to be a realistic repayment plan from the outset. We should judge these loans by the whole outcome: what they enabled, what they cost and whether the borrower repaid them as intended.
Copy

Pro
Nouran MoustafaVerified
Practice Principal & IFA at Roxton Wealth
iContact details are shown to logged-in members. Log in
Bridging finance has an unfair reputation for being a last resort. Sometimes it's precisely what makes a property transaction possible.

Imagine securing a property significantly below market value because the seller needs completion within weeks. A traditional mortgage might take too long, while bridging could secure the purchase.

But the numbers must work. A £200,000 bridge at 0.75% monthly interest costs £1,500 per month before fees. Over six months, that's £9,000 in interest alone, assuming the full balance remains outstanding.

The biggest misconception is that bridging is inherently bad. It isn't. Borrowing without a credible repayment strategy is.

I would discourage bridging where a conventional mortgage, further advance or other suitable funding could achieve the same outcome at lower cost.

My rule is simple: bridging should solve a temporary problem, not create a permanent financial one.

A successful bridge isn't one that completes quickly. It's one that exits successfully
Copy

Pro
Harvey DhillonVerified
Founder & CEO at Zmartly
iContact details are shown to logged-in members. Log in
The idea that bridging is only a last resort for people in trouble is misleading, but the worry about its cost still stands. Buying your next home before the old one sells can be a planned move, and a bridge is one way to pay for it. For a home buyer in England, though, the cost goes beyond the interest and fees. A bridge lets you buy before you sell, so you'll still own the old home at the end of completion day. That means paying the extra stamp duty on the new home, and your solicitor will usually send it to HMRC on the day you complete. You only get it back if the old home is sold within a time limit and you claim the refund in time. So it's a mistake to price a bridge on the lender's charges alone. Count the extra stamp duty as cash you'll need on the day, and don't complete until you know both deadlines.
Copy

Pro
Dariusz KarpowiczVerified
Director at Albion Financial Advice
iContact details are shown to logged-in members. Log in
Expensive does not mean desperate when you use bridging finance. New borrowers regularly underestimate the true price. Borrowing £200,000 at a monthly 0.75% rate racks up £9,000 in interest across six months, excluding arrangement fees.

Property investors must factor this expense into their initial figures. When a vendor requires completion within weeks and accepts 20% under market value, your margin easily covers the finance. Unless you hold pure cash, bridging often remains your sole option. Pair the loan with a guaranteed exit strategy and it works brilliantly. Lack that exit, and you face the priciest accidental mortgage imaginable.
Copy

Pro
Tracey DixonVerified
Buy-to-Let Mortgage Specialist & Owner at Pure Mortgage and Protection
iContact details are shown to logged-in members. Log in
A bridging loan should buy you time, not buy you a bigger problem.

Bridging can be a useful tool when a property needs work before it qualifies for a standard mortgage, or a purchase must complete before sale proceeds become available. Calling it an expensive last resort overlooks situations where it serves a clear purpose.

But completing the purchase is only half the story. The real test is whether the borrower can repay the bridge, on time, at an acceptable overall cost. “We’ll refinance later” needs evidence behind it: lender criteria, affordability and a realistic valuation.

Interest, fees and the cost of delays all need to be included. If a standard mortgage or a negotiated extension can achieve the same outcome more cheaply, those options deserve serious consideration.

The strongest bridging case starts with a credible exit, not just an urgent deadline.