News comment: 86% more job seekers are searching for Work From Anywhere schemes
I'm writing a piece today for People Management about research from Flexa which reveals that more and more job seekers are looking for roles that allow the to work from anywhere/fully remotely.
Some of the findings include:
- 86% more job seekers were searching for WFA schemes last quarter (up from 7% of all searches in January, to 15% of all searches in March)
- 58% of all job seekers were searching for "fully remote" roles in March (up from 48% of all job seekers in January)
- Instead of fully remote roles, employers are tending to offer “remote-first” roles; where employees work remotely most of the time, but also have the option to use office space on flexible or set days. The number of remote-first roles being advertised by companies rose from 14% in January to 19% in March
- The number of job seekers expressing a preference for working for companies offering “unlimited annual leave” increased by 33% between January and February
- Preferences for “summer hours” (where workers are able to finish earlier on Fridays during summer months) rose by 68%
I am looking for comment on any of the following:
Is the job market at a level where employers are having to adapt to jobseekers? Or is there so much competition that jobseekers have to take whatever they get? In other words, whose court is the ball in between employers and jobseekers?
Why are employers offering remote-first roles rather than fully remote roles?
What would these flexible working perks, including summer hours and unlimited annual leave, mean for a company and HR?
Is the rise in remote/flexible job searches purely down to the seasonal change (as we head towards spring/summer) or is there more to it?
Full link to the research: https://flexa.careers/blog/workers-prioritise-work-from-anywhere-jobs
My deadline is 12pm.



