Copy article

MoneyWeek- Is a student loan worth it or should you fund your child's education

Journalist: Marc Shoffman, Freelance

ended 27. February 2026

I am writing a piece for MoneyWeek looking at the student loan furore over interest charges and the payment threshold.

I am looking for views from a parenting/financial perspective. Should you encourage your child to still take a student loan even though it could have consequences for getting a mortgage etc in the future?

Or are you better off setting money aside and funding university for them?

Kind regards

Marc

4 responses from the Newspage community

Copy all

Copy

Student loans are often misunderstood. They function more like an income contingent graduate tax than a traditional debt, which means they shouldn’t automatically deter a young person from going to university.
From a mortgage perspective, lenders do factor in the monthly deduction for affordability, but it is rarely the sole reason someone cannot borrow. The real impact is subtler it reduces net income and slows long term wealth building.
The bigger question for parents is strategic. Funding university outright is wonderful if it fits within the family’s wider financial plan. But it should never come at the expense of parents’ retirement security or overall stability.
What matters most is education. A student loan without understanding becomes a silent drag on future finances. With awareness and planning, it becomes simply another structural part of someone’s financial life.
The decision shouldn’t be driven by fear of interest headlines it should be driven by a long term vision.
Copy

The student loan debate misses an uncomfortable point that families who can afford to pay fees upfront often have children who go on to earn enough to cross the repayment threshold. In other words, the graduates most likely to fully repay their loans are often from households that could have funded university in the first place. For them, high interest rates genuinely matter because they may clear the balance in full, plus years of interest. That is why this is not simply a moral decision about avoiding debt. If your child is likely to become a high earner, paying fees upfront or reducing the loan could save tens of thousands over time. If earnings are uncertain, the loan still behaves more like a capped graduate tax and offers built in protection if income falls. The key is to assess probable career paths and earning power, rather than react purely to the headline interest rate.
Copy

If you’re lucky enough to be able to find your child’s uni education this is the way to go. Allowing them to take student finance is committing them to an effective graduate tax for life. Unless they will earn over £80,000 per year, they are unlikely to ever pay it off. You have to earn over £65,000 to chip away at any capital given the current interest rates. It’s a system that needs address or will become a brake on uni admissions.
Copy

Most people signing up for a student loan have little idea what they are actually agreeing to. It works more like a graduate tax than real debt, quietly reducing take-home pay once earnings cross the threshold.
The key question is whether your child will earn enough to ever clear it. High earners often repay far more than they borrowed once interest builds up, so paying fees upfront can save tens of thousands. Lower earners may never clear it anyway, making it behave more like a capped contribution. Think careers first, interest rate headlines second.