Why do landlords lease properties to the government for asylum seekers?
There has been a lot of clamouring today over the use of four new-build townhouses in Suffolk to house asylum seekers - but the properties are ultimately privately owned and leased to provider Serco, who guarantee five years of rent paid with no voids, regular maintenance and inspection, all at no cost to landlords.
If you are a landlord or property investor, this arrangement arguably makes a lot of sense from a financial perspective. Are you a property investor, and have you leased any accommodation to contractors for the purposes of housing asylum seekers - or would you? Or can you offer any insight into why landlords would do this rather than rent out to other tenants?



