Copy article

Newspage RawSource: Kate Underwood, Kate Underwood HR & Training

Barclays and the return to office climbdown

ended 10. October 2026

Barclays blinked. The firm of eight has nobody to blink at

Barclays was due to push most of its 45,000 UK staff from two office days to three on 5 October, and managing directors to four. After thousands of employees signed an open letter coordinated by Unite, staff can now ask a line manager to defer until the start of 2027. Unite says the bank cannot provide an evidence-based rationale and wants exemptions for commutes over 40 minutes or 35 miles each way, a one-day cap for long-term carers, and a one-off payment before March 2027. Barclays calls it transitional measures, not a climbdown. https://remoteworkeurope.eu/news/2026/barclays-delays-three-day-office-mandate-2027/

Call it what you like, the date moved. That is the bit small employers should notice. 45,000 people with a union and a press pack got themselves a delay. The eight people in a small firm have nobody to sign a letter to and no reporter waiting for the reply. It cuts both ways too, because the owner of that firm has nobody to lobby when the rules change on them either. Everyone in the middle ends up carrying somebody else's risk, which is how it usually works.

What we asked of experts:

  • Proof that pushback works, or a management team losing its nerve?
  • Should an office mandate need evidence behind it, or is "because we said so" enough from an employer?
  • Have you changed where your team works this year? What did it take to make it stick?

3 responses from the Newspage community

Copy all

Story Source
Copy

Pro
Kate UnderwoodVerified
Founder & Chief People Strategist at Kate Underwood HR & Training
iContact details are shown to logged-in members. Log in
Barclays can call it transitional measures all it likes, but the date moved, and dates don't move on their own. That's what pushback looks like when you've got 45,000 people, a union and a press pack. The firm of eight has none of that. No letter to sign, no reporter waiting on a quote, and if they're told to come in Monday they come in Monday. Here's the bit that gets missed though. That owner has nobody to lobby either. When costs or rules land on them they just absorb it and hope. Everybody in the middle carries somebody else's risk. On the evidence point, yes, you should have a reason. Not a management consultant's slide, just an honest answer to why three days works better than two for this business. If you can't say it out loud to your team, it won't survive a flexible working request either. Write down your reason now. You'll be asked for it.
Copy

Pro
Harvey DhillonVerified
Founder & CEO at Zmartly
iContact details are shown to logged-in members. Log in
I started my career at Barclays, and I would call this proof that pushback works, but only partly. Thousands of staff signed one letter and won a route to defer until 2027. That is not a management team losing its nerve, though. Barclays calls it a transitional measure, and the three-day rule itself has not gone anywhere.

My team works across the UK, the Philippines and Pakistan, so the rule that matters to us is about hours, not desks. Everyone works 09:00 to 18:00 UK time, wherever they sit. It sticks because everyone can see the reason for it: it takes the time-zone friction out of working across three countries.

On evidence, a mandate does not need a consultant's report, but it does need a link to the work. Name the tasks that go worse when people are apart, whether that is training juniors, reviewing work or looking after clients. Skip that step and the extra day reads as a preference, and preferences are what open letters get written about.
Copy

Pro
Tony SanchezVerified
Founder at Bridging Loan Directory
iContact details are shown to logged-in members. Log in
I run Bridging Loan Directory from home, so I judge working arrangements by whether the work gets done well. If an employer wants more office attendance, they should explain what it will improve: training, collaboration, customer service or something specific to the role. “Because we said so” is a weak basis for a change that affects people’s time and costs.

Listening to objections and adjusting the timetable can be sensible management. It does not automatically mean losing your nerve.

I also question the assumption that people in small firms have nobody to raise concerns with. Direct access to the owner can make discussion easier, although that depends on whether the owner is willing to listen.

The useful question is what each arrangement delivers for the business and the people doing the work. A fixed number of office days needs a purpose.