Copy article

Sizewell C

Journalist: Jon King, Daily Express Online

ended 22. July 2025

Energy Secretary Ed Miliband has signed the final investment decision to give the Sizewell C the green light.

The Government will become the biggest equity shareholder in the project with a 44.9% stake.

Sizewell C investors include La Caisse with 20%, British Gas owner Centrica with 15%, and Amber Infrastructure with an initial 7.6%. EDF is taking a 12.5% stake.

The Daily Express is looking to provide readers with an idea as to how much profit investors stand to make from their investment and whether Sizewell C offers value for money for British taxpayers.

5 responses from the Newspage community

Copy all

Star Quote
Copy

Backing Sizewell C is a long-term strategic bet on energy security and net zero, but that does not mean we should stop asking tough questions. Taxpayers are now the largest investor in this project, so transparency on costs, returns and delivery must be non-negotiable. The real measure of value for money will not just be investor profit. It will be whether this delivers clean, reliable power without blowing the public purse.
Copy

Sizewell C’s £38bn nuclear project, approved by Ed Miliband, strengthens UK energy security with stable baseload power for 6m homes, reducing reliance on volatile renewables and fossil fuels, as seen in recent Spain-Portugal outages. The UK Government holds a 44.9% stake. Under the Regulated Asset Base model, investors may earn 6-8% annually, potentially £66-174m/year each. Taxpayers fund £14.2bn and face £1/month bill hikes, risking overruns to £50-60bn, reminiscent of HS2. Benefits include 10,000 jobs and £2bn in system savings, but taxpayers should be cautious of escalating costs.
Copy

Sizewell C is the definition of a government mega project, but one with few opponents. The cost of energy is only getting higher and war in Ukraine proves the need for energy security; the more we produce on our own shores the better. Dealing with nuclear matierial is still a problem, but compared to the carbon emmissions created by coal and gas, it is a genuine green alternative. This should see lower bills for customers, but only once in production and that may take decades.
Copy

Sizewell C has the potential to offer real value for taxpayers, but only if lessons from Hinkley Point C are properly learned and applied. If the project stays on budget and avoids the kind of overruns we’ve seen with HS2, the public could benefit through long-term energy security and a return on investment. But with a 44.9% government stake, we’re also on the hook if it goes wrong.
Copy

This is an awful lot of money to buy technology that will likely be outdated by the time it is built. Now that modular reactors are in development, they offer greater flexibility, reduced planning needs and reduced risk of single point failure. The government is also locking into an electricity price which is historically high, so it’s a massive risk to take. Of course, if the go ahead had been given 20 years ago when it really should have, then we wouldn’t have those concerns but we are where we are.