Politics

Copy article

Newspage Raw

Seeking comment: What the rising cost of government debt means for taxpayers

Journalist Media RequestiThe journalist's name and outlet are shown to Plus and Pro members. Log in

ended 22. October 2026

I’m looking for expert commentary on the UK government’s rising debt interest bill, which is forecast to reach £130.3bn in 2025/26 - more than the amount spent on education. I’d welcome insight into what is driving the cost, how it affects the Chancellor’s ability to cut taxes or increase public spending, and what the implications could be for households.

Questions for Newspagers

  1. The government is forecast to spend £130.3bn on debt interest in 2025/26 — more than on education or defence. Why is the bill so high?
  2. What does this level of debt interest mean for the Chancellor's ability to cut taxes or increase spending on public services?
  3. 1. How could the cost of government borrowing affect households over the coming years, and what should people understand about the risks?

6 responses from the Newspage community

Copy all

Copy

Pro
Nouran MoustafaVerified
Practice Principal & IFA at Roxton Wealth
iContact details are shown to logged-in members. Log in
The debt-interest bill is so high because the UK is carrying a very large stock of debt while borrowing costs are much higher than they were a few years ago. As older government debt matures, some of it has to be refinanced at higher rates, while inflation also increases payments on index-linked gilts.

The problem for the Chancellor is simple: money spent servicing debt cannot also be spent cutting taxes or improving public services.

Households do not receive a £130bn bill directly, but they can still feel the consequences through tighter public spending, pressure on taxes and higher borrowing costs if government bond yields remain elevated.

The important point is that government borrowing costs do not stay inside Westminster. They can eventually feed through into mortgages, business finance and the wider economy.

Debt interest is not just an accounting number. It reduces financial room for manoeuvre.
Copy

Pro
Graham NicollVerified
Financial Planner, Chartered FCSI at NCL Wealth Partners
iContact details are shown to logged-in members. Log in
Britain cannot cut its way to prosperity. A huge debt pile, higher rates and inflation-linked gilts drive the interest bill, squeezing room for tax cuts and services. But slashing productive investment could weaken growth and worsen the debt burden. Households risk a triple squeeze: higher taxes, stretched services and dearer mortgages. The Chancellor needs credible growth plans: borrowing more is no substitute for making borrowing count.
Copy

Pro
Tony RedondoVerified
Founder at Cosmos Currency Exchange
iContact details are shown to logged-in members. Log in
It takes a special lack of financial nous for this government to deliver the highest tax take in history alongside the highest borrowing in history outside a world war, Covid or the financial crash. The result? A debt interest bill forecast at £130.3bn in 2025/26, more than the education budget and double defence. It’s a non-negotiable obligation, roughly 8% of state spending, and it shackles the Chancellor’s room for manoeuvre. The start of the end for Starmer came from trying to merely slow the growth of the benefits bill, proof that this lot of MPs are living in cloud-cuckoo land. It will end in tears, with the taxpayer picking up the tab. For households and businesses, that means historically high taxes, strained public services and heightened vulnerability to shocks, because revenue goes on servicing past borrowing, not funding future growth.
Copy

Pro
Harvey DhillonVerified
Founder & CEO at Zmartly
iContact details are shown to logged-in members. Log in
The bill is high because Britain owes a lot and now pays more to refinance it. There's also an accounting quirk: the inflation added to index-linked gilts is counted as interest now, even though it's only paid out when the bonds mature. That's still money owed, not spare cash. Every pound spent on interest is a pound the Chancellor can't use to cut taxes or fund services without borrowing more, and more borrowing pushes the interest bill up again. For households, the risk is quieter than a rise in tax rates. Income tax thresholds are frozen until April 2031, so as wages rise, more of each pay packet is taxed. A pay rise that only matches inflation leaves you worse off in real terms once tax is taken. When you hear "no rise in tax rates" at next week's Budget, don't read it as "no rise in your tax bill".
Copy

Pro
Paul DenleyVerified
CEO at Oakham Wealth Management
iContact details are shown to logged-in members. Log in
The bill reflects three forces: debt of around 100% of GDP, elevated borrowing costs and a large stock of inflation linked gilts. The era of cheap borrowing is firmly behind us, and the Treasury - or rather, we - are paying the price.

Every pound spent servicing debt is unavailable for public services or tax cuts. With fiscal headroom uncomfortably thin and bond investors scrutinising the public finances, the Chancellor has little room for manoeuvre.

For households, expect continued pressure on taxes and public spending, while higher gilt yields can feed through to mortgage and business lending rates. The danger is a vicious circle of weak growth, higher debt costs and rising taxes. Households should plan for taxes staying higher for longer, rather than hope for imminent relief.
Copy

Damian PudnerVerified
Director at Great British Think Tank
iContact details are shown to logged-in members. Log in
Britain is paying an enormous price for decades of fiscal irresponsibility and monetary policy mistakes. Successive governments have failed to control spending or produce a credible plan to stabilise debt. Investors demand a 'moron premium' for that failure. We also squandered the opportunity to lock in cheap 30- and 50-year borrowing, while excessive Covid-era QE and index-linked gilts increased our exposure to rising rates and inflation.

For every £5 borrowed last year, roughly £4 was equivalent to debt interest. That's unsustainable. At Great British Think Tank, we believe £150bn in annual spending reductions by the end of this Parliament is required, alongside radical supply-side reform to restore growth and allow lower taxes.

High borrowing costs also threaten mortgage affordability and house prices. Falling property values weaken collateral, tighten credit and damage investment. Even Bank Rate cuts may offer limited relief if gilt yields remain high due to government inaction.