Copy article

Over 40s taking out long-term mortgages

Journalist: Rachel Mortimer, The Times

ended 06. October 2022

Have got some FCA data showing a spike in over 40s borrowers taking out mortgages with a term of 35 years or more in the first two months of this year compared with previous years. One adviser has attributed this to higher house prices, but has precited the trend will continue as interest rates soar and borrowers need a long term to be able to afford repayments. 

Do you agree? Can we expect to see more older borrowers forced into longer term mortgages, potentially threatening their retirement planning? 

p.s. What are lender rules around lending to “older” borrowers? Is there a point where they can't lend on a longer-term mortgage? 

Thank you very much! 

Rachel 

6 responses from the Newspage community

Copy all

Copy

The average age of a first-time buyer has increased over the years & people are living and working longer. Therefore, it is no surprise that the number of "older" borrowers is rising. There are lenders who are happy to lend past the state retirement age if they are comfortable with the applicant's role, loan serviceability, and/or retirement income. Given the current economic climate, I think more lenders will be reconsidering their criteria to accommodate later life lending.
Copy

I expect this to continue for the foreseeable future whilst property prices remain at the levels they are and with interest rates rising and income levels stagnant, 30 and 35 year terms will start to become the norm many lenders are happy on the basis the client has some form of pension provisions in place and can evidence this as many lenders do lending to the age of 70 and 75 some also beyond this point but it has to be sustainable.
Copy

There seems to be a trend more recently where customers are extending terms to the maximum allowable age, with some lenders allowing customers to go to the age of 75 with the use of current income. When the mortgage term goes beyond customers age of 70, most lenders tend to factor in estimated retirement income, which is then used to determine affordability. The reason for taking the maximum term is down to a few reasons. One of them being a steep increase in house prices, where customers can usually borrow more on the maximum term allowed. The other reasons, which I believe are the main reasons are increasing interest rates and cost of living. With the energy prices at the beginning of the year continuing to rise (now at a steady pace due to the cap on energy), most customers will still pay more than they’ve been used, so they want to ensure they can afford mortgage payments. This is also effected by the cost of living increasing as we’re experiencing everything else costing more than usual. People want to have comfort each month with disposable income, so they want to reduce the cost of outgoings as much as they can. It's been mentioned in the industry for some time, for lenders to increase the max age of lending on a residential basis using current income. The life expectancy for people living in the UK is as high as it’s been, but isn’t reflected in normal life scenarios. Although state retirement age is before the age of 70, we’re seeing a lot more people continuing to work in their 70’s, but unable to have a mortgage with most main lenders during this time. We have to remember, most mortgages are done through the intermediary channels, so customers will continue to get advice when they remortgage allowing the brokers to assess new circumstances to ensure the mortgages are still affordable once they near retirement age. Some things do need to change in the industry, and I believe they will, but until then, we will see more people taking the maximum mortgage terms allowed to reduce outgoings during the current climate, where many things are uncertain.
Copy

Naturally, more often than not people want a low monthly payment and can often see extending the term as a way of reaching this. With the rising costs of mortgages, it's likely going to heighten this becoming a more regular scenario. Retirement plans could quickly become ruined for many customers unless they plan to sell up and downsize or may face having to consider equity release to get by. Lenders will typically take one of two stances of lending past the typical retirement age. One scenario would be working off a plausibility basis. If a person works in a desk-based office job it's unlikely to present an issue of them working to the age of 75. However, if they are a builder they are likely to question the plausibility of working in that kind of role until then. Other lenders may take the view that if they can evidence sight that the customer is paying into a pension they are happy to lend past state retirement.
Copy

A lot of people are now rethinking their mortgage term to keep mortgage payments at an affordable level as they remortgage off deals of 2% or 3% and into a world of 5% mortgages; but this is not new with many people purchasing property over the past few years also looking at longer terms as a way of affording the ever-increasing cost of property. In theory the idea of an extended term is not a huge issue, as long as you are comfortable working until the proposed end date (or have a fantastic pension plan). Many lenders are happy to consider people extending their working lives to age 70 without any real issue, a few will go beyond that to 75 or even 80, but those lenders will want to know the sort of work you do to ensure that is reasonable - a barrister working to 75 would be considered a lot more likely than a roofer, for example.
Copy

The vast majority of lenders only allow the mortgage term to extend to the oldest applicant's 70th birthday using employment or self-employment income. Beyond 70 years of age, retirement income needs to be sufficient to support the mortgage payments. With mortgage rates soaring and life expectancy increasing, it's likely that more lenders will allow mortgage terms to extend to 75 years based on employment income alone. But only where the type of work involved is viable at that age. A solicitor might be accepted, but a construction worker probably not.