Copy article

MoneyWeek article - how much of your assets should you invest?

Journalist: Marc Shoffman, Freelance

ended 29. April 2026

Research by Fidelity shows households hold record levels of cash.

Its analysis found almost a quarter (23%) of UK households’ financial assets were held in investments ahead of the dotcom crisis, compared with 17% today.

I am keen for comments on the risks of holding too much cash and also what proportion of a household's assets should people typically invest?
Kind regards

Marc

10 responses from the Newspage community

Copy all

Copy

Factor in your immediate needs, what may come up within the next 5 years, and what is left over; what remains is what you should consider for wider options. To give you a starting point, I sometimes say, 'If I fast-forwarded time and we are 5 years in the future, how much of what you have is still likely to be there?' It's a great way to kick off the coverstation and get people thinking. Clients also need to be educated that holding too much cash comes at a cost, especially with inflation looking to change trajectory.
Copy

Most likely a period of financial repression will follow around the world as Governments are battling high debt to GDP ratios and holding your money in cash or government bonds will result in negative real returns. There is no exact proportion, you need to have some low volatile investments (not necessarily cash) for contingencies, but the asset allocation should be based on achieving your long term life goals.
Copy

The UK has never developed the investment culture seen in countries like the US or Australia, and that shapes how households behave with their money. Much of the nation's wealth sits with baby boomers, many of whom lived through high inflation eras, the dotcom crash, and 2008 experiences that understandably reinforce a preference for cash and property over markets. With inflation having run well above target in recent years, money in low-interest accounts has steadily lost real value. Frozen tax thresholds also mean more savings interest is now pulled into income tax, reducing returns further.
There isn't a one size fits all answer for how much to invest. A practical way to think about it is in layers: short term money for emergencies and known costs, medium term savings for goals within a few years, and longer term capital that can tolerate market ups and downs. The longer the time horizon, the more room there may be to consider investing.
Copy

The biggest danger of holding too much cash is inflation quietly eroding its value over time. If you look at the cost of everyday items, even something as simple as eggs over the past five years you can see how cash loses purchasing power. While cash feels safe, in real terms it can be one of the riskiest assets over the long term. That said, cash absolutely has a role. It’s essential for short-term spending, emergency funds and providing peace of mind. The right balance depends entirely on the individual, their age, goals, spending needs and other assets. For example, someone with secure income from a State Pension or defined benefit pension may be able to invest more than someone without that certainty. There’s no one-size-fits-all percentage, but many UK households are holding more cash than needed compared to other developed economies. The key is making sure excess cash beyond what’s needed for security is working harder through investments aligned to long-term goals
Copy

Cash feels safe, but over time it is a drag on performance. Inflation steadily erodes its real value, so holding too much can quietly damage long-term wealth.

It is still important to keep a safety buffer. While the FCA does not set a fixed rule, around three months of essential spending is a sensible guide. Beyond that, excess cash often becomes inefficient.

Some clients, where appropriate, take a more proactive approach by investing surplus funds in a Stocks and Shares ISA using liquid investments. These can usually be accessed within a few days if needed. Short-term borrowing, such as a credit card, can cover immediate emergencies while funds are withdrawn. This carries risk, so it is not for everyone.

In reality, most wealth already sits in pensions and property, so the decision is often about how to use surplus funds. As a general principle, both cash and investments should be held within ISAs where possible to maximise tax efficiency.
Copy

As uncertainty increases, may people are staying clear of investments and sheltering their savings in cash. However, with inflation taking off this might be the only asset class that is guaranteed to lose you money. Set aside an emergency fund and maybe a little extra in today’s environment, but anything that you won’t need to ‘fix the roof’ should be invested wisely to make a real return.
Copy

Holding too much cash can feel safe, but it is not always safe in real terms. Cash gives certainty of balance, but inflation quietly eats the spending power behind that balance. The question is not “cash or investments?” It is “what job is this money meant to do?” I would separate money into buckets: an emergency fund, short-term spending, medium-term goals and long-term wealth. Cash is ideal for the first two. Money genuinely not needed for five years plus should at least be considered for investment, because time gives people the ability to ride market volatility. There is no magic percentage that fits every household. A young professional with stable income may invest more; someone nearing retirement, buying a home or supporting family may need more cash. The danger is when people hold cash not by strategy, but by fear or confusion. Good financial planning should turn that fear into structure. Cash protects today. Investing, done properly and diversified, helps protect tomorrow too.
Copy

There is no right or wrong % of assets that should be held in cash...it depends on the individual, there circumstance, their spending plans and their short / medium and long term needs.

That said, setting aside cash that would cover 3 - 6 months regular spending is prudent as a "cash reserve" or "emergency fun". Add on top of this cash require for any specific spending plans such as house renovations or large purchase to get a realistic sum to hold in cash.

The key principle I would apply is medium to long term cash holdings should ideally be invested in line with a clients goals / risk appetite and risk tolerance.
Copy

The answer is naturally bespoke to each individual. However, the general rule of thumb is that your money needs to be working for you. There is very little point in hoarding money in cash, and if you can benefit from the power of compounding interest and investment returns, you can build your wealth up to the point where you can replace or supplement your income, affording you to retire.

I would encourage anyway who has a large amount of cash to consider the advice of Warren Buffett: "If you don't find a way to make money while you sleep, you will work until you die". Although I suppose rather ironically, Buffett worked until he was 95...
Copy

Holding too much cash can feel safe, but over long periods it often creates a quieter risk: inflation, missed compounding and a portfolio that never really gets to work. The problem is not cash itself. Households need liquidity for emergencies, short term spending and near term commitments. The risk comes when large balances sit idle by default rather than by design.

There is no universal percentage that everyone should invest because age, income security, debt, time horizon and tolerance for volatility all matter. But as a principle, cash should usually cover resilience, while longer term capital should be invested according to when it will be needed and how much volatility the household can genuinely absorb.

Too many people frame this as cash versus investing. The real question is whether each pound has a job. If long term money is sitting in cash indefinitely, that is often caution turning into costly drift.