Copy article

Lionesses branding comment for Mail Online

ended 19. July 2023

A journalist at the Mail Online is after some quick comment from (personal) branding and marketing experts on the England Lionesses, ahead of the World Cup, joining a campaign by Bluebella lingerie to encourage teenage girls not to drop out of sport. You can read the initial article here:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-12312285/England-Lionesses-Fara-Williams-Reanna-Blades-Womens-World-Cup.html 

The journalist wants to know whether, in your opinion, this sends a positive message, and whether it's the most progressive thing for them to be doing? Any thoughts, whizz them across ASAP as this story is being written now.

5 responses from the Newspage community

Copy all

Copy

Being scarred for life from wearing maroon regulation knickers and a sports bra resembling a hammock to hold down my vast bosom, I fail to see the correlation between skimpy underwear and keeping girls in sport. My own sporting career despite these hideous garments took me to an international level, well Scotland if you call that international, and seeing my sporting heroes in pretty underwear would have been confusing rather than motivational.
Copy

As the French national team use deepfake to cement female empowerment in the 21st century through their 2023 FIFA Women’s World Cup ad, here in England, we're catapulting women's empowerment into regression. I can't see the link between encouraging women to do sport and photos that resemble screenshots from a badly made adult film. If the defence for this campaign is body pride, I would argue that it reinforces objectification of the female body, and, off the top of my head, there are at least 10 better ways to send a message that truly inspires and catalyses critical thinking.
Copy

There is some unconscious bias energy going on here. Positioning skimpy underwear against a traditionally male-dominated sport, and somehow claiming this as female empowerment, plays right into the patriarchal dominance in society. Why do we have to discredit these women's skills and capabilities when they've worked so hard to put women's football on the map? Attaching their achievements to what they look like and how sexually available they appear to be is a step backwards and not the right message for teenage girls to be receiving. Last year, the women's team achieved what the male England team has failed to do since 1966 by beating Germany. What a reductive next step to have taken.
Copy

As a father of a little girl who loves her football, I just hope we can talk more about what is done on the pitch and inspire girls in that way. The team has quality players and great role models that can do their talking on the pitch.
Copy

Unfortunately, we live in a world where young girls will drop out of sports as there is an inherent societal pressure to focus on their bodily appearance and image, rather than allowing them to pursue their passions and hobbies that they truly love. I understand the sentiment behind this campaign, they are trying to show that young girls can still look beautiful and play sports. However, this campaign doesn't correlate to their talents or capabilities, which are much bigger than lingerie. You have to ask, who will benefit the most from this, the young girls that they are trying to connect with or the lingerie brand behind the campaign?