Copy article

Independent article: - Should you be spend more or save more amid plans for pensions to come under inheritance tax?

Journalist: Marc Shoffman, Freelance

ended 26. September 2025

I am writing a piece for The Independent looking at plans for pensions to come under inheritance tax from April 2027.

I am keen for views on what those coming up to retirement or even decades away should be considering now.

What do the chancellor's proposed pensions reforms mean for people saving for retirement?

What are the financial planning implications?

Should people save less/look at other vehicles/give more gifts?

Many thanks, 
Marc


 

8 responses from the Newspage community

Copy all

Star Quote
Copy

Pensions have always been seen as one of the most tax-efficient ways to pass on wealth. If and when that changes, savers need to think more strategically. For those close to retirement, it may mean drawing from pensions earlier rather than leaving them untouched as a legacy pot. For younger savers, it doesn’t mean stopping contributions – you still get upfront tax relief and employer top-ups – but it does mean reviewing how pensions fit alongside ISAs and other investments. From a planning perspective, gifting and using allowances while alive could become more attractive, because once inside a taxed pension wrapper the options narrow. The key takeaway is that diversification of savings vehicles and forward planning around how and when wealth is passed on will matter more than ever.
Star Quote
Copy

Now more than ever is the time to look at diversification of your tax policy by using multiple ‘pots’ such as pensions, ISAs, property and cash so you’re not over-exposed to one tax regime or rule. If the rules change, the impact should be limited. While tax is important, don't let policy rumours hold you back from saving as much as you can afford. Focus on what you can control and remember that two of the most important determinants for success in investing are how much you invest and how long you invest for. Think carefully before making irreversible choices, like taking your entire tax-free lump sum based on changes that may not last. But if you’re keen to help your kids and you can afford to, lifetime gifts can be better than leaving money in a will. If you live for more than seven years after making a gift, it becomes completely free of IHT and children often benefit more from having help earlier in life, for example when buying a home or raising children.
Copy

For the average man in the street, inheritance tax on pensions is one problem they don’t need to worry about. For the vast majority of people saving for retirement, these reforms—whilst unwelcome—shouldn’t change their plans at all. Most already struggle to save enough for a comfortable retirement, so worrying about inheritance tax is an unnecessary distraction. Even many of those who could be affected may find the impact reduced as annuities regain popularity thanks to higher rates. Put simply, any money you use to buy an annuity—ignoring early death benefits—effectively escapes the inheritance tax net. The real impact will fall on the wealthiest, or on those who don’t spend enough of their savings in retirement. Unfortunately, that includes many of our clients, and that’s where our focus on inheritance tax planning will be. But for the average man in the street, this isn’t likely to be a problem.
Copy

There are two key questions you need to answer before you consider anything. Firstly is how much will you need over the course of your life and how are you going to fund that? The second is what is your attitude to inheritance tax - are you bothered or do you want there to be no tax bill? If you think you have more than you need and you want to reduce a bill then professional advice could be worth every penny. If you get your planning wrong it could make the bill worse or land your family with a big care bill.
Copy

“Pensions and IHT: one-size-fits-all answers don’t work” Now more than ever; the advice needs to be bespoke. The old rule of “pensions last” has been turned on its head by the proposed 2027 changes, but that doesn’t automatically mean everyone should rush to draw pensions first. The right approach depends on your tax rate, the likely tax position of your beneficiaries, and your overall goals. What we are seeing is more interest in gifting particularly gifts out of surplus income, as well as greater use of whole-of-life insurance, trusts, and business relief. But these are complex areas where a wrong move can backfire. Poorly timed withdrawals or gifts can have second-order consequences, such as unnecessary income tax bills or lost allowances. The key message is simple: don’t make knee-jerk decisions. With pensions becoming part of the IHT net, long-term planning has never been more critical.
Copy

For those nearing retirement, the old balance between drawing income and preserving capital now has to be reconsidered, because leaving too much untouched could invite inheritance tax. Even for people already in drawdown, the decision is shifting away from being purely about income tax efficiency and towards weighing that against potential IHT exposure. Younger savers face a different reality. The fundamentals of pensions remain attractive—tax relief on contributions, employer top-ups, and long-term tax-free growth still provide a strong case for building retirement wealth this way. At the same time, no one should assume today’s tax treatment is fixed forever. Future governments could reverse or adjust the legislation, meaning pensions might yet regain their position outside IHT. The key point is that pensions should continue to be viewed first and foremost as the cornerstone of retirement funding. Savers should continue to take advantage of their many benefits.
Copy

Anyone within a decade of retirement should urgently review whether maximising pension contributions still makes sense when beneficiaries face 40% tax raids on inherited funds.

The traditional advice of stuffing money into pensions for tax relief becomes questionable when the Treasury claws back far more through inheritance tax than it ever gave through contribution relief.

Smart planners are already exploring whether property investment, ISAs, or direct gifting strategies provide better outcomes for family wealth preservation.

Meanwhile, those approaching retirement should consider accelerated withdrawal strategies that deplete pension pots during their lifetime rather than leaving substantial funds for the Treasury to confiscate from grieving beneficiaries.

The brutal reality is that pension planning has become inheritance tax planning in disguise. Families serious about preserving wealth across generations need professional advice here and now.
Copy

Let me preface this by saying I am by no means suggesting not to have a retirement plan. Everyone should be investing in a pension.

However, I do find it strange the extent to which IFAs consistently want people to be focusing on retirement, a time when you can arguably do less due to physical limitations and effectively forego enjoyment now.

In my view, what needs to happen is a redefining of risk in the UK. There is far too much focus on risk and not enough on opportunity - there are opportunities to increase wealth in the much shorter term, rather than simply thinking your wealth should be earned for retirement.

JPMorgan for instance, found one of the top reasons that Brits don't invest is because they think stocks are too risky, when in fact the risk of not investing for shorter term gains is far riskier for your wealth due to opportunity cost!

Britain has a risk problem, commanded to them by disincentives from the top - Westminster.