"Dual life cover is underused and deserves more attention"
One insurance expert, Joe Farmer, Protection Advisor at When The Bank Says No, has said “dual life cover is underused and deserves more attention”, adding: “I believe it’s something the industry should be exploring more, especially when both individuals being insured play an equally important financial role.”
Sean Horton, Managing Director at Respect Capital, agrees: “Dual life cover is a far superior setup compared to standard joint life (first death) policies. It's simple for the customer, as they only have one policy to worry about. And there's the potential for two death claims as the survivor remains covered.”
Meanwhile, David Stirling, Director at Mint Mortgages & Protection, says: “Financial planners have a duty to offer fair value to clients and proactively prevent foreseeable harm. Joint policies, while often perceived as convenient, tend to be inflexible. A change in health, family history, BMI or occupation for either individual can make altering or updating the plan difficult — even if only one person is affected. This can leave the healthier client locked into inadequate or outdated cover that no longer meets their needs or priorities.”
But Scott Gallacher, Director at Rowley Turton, warns that "it's critical that any recommendation of dual life cover is backed by a clearly identified client need, rather than simply upselling." Views below.




