Copy article

Tactical trackers

ended 23. June 2026

An IFA on Newspage has said he is seeing growing demand among his clients for tactical tracker funds, which combine the low costs of index tracking with the agility of active management. Are you seeing growing demand among your clients for tactical asset allocation trackers? Have you recommended any recently? How should tactical trackers sit within a portfolio and how do they add value? What’s their main role?

4 responses from the Newspage community

Copy all

Star Quote
Copy

There has been a clear shift towards trackers as many investors question whether active fund charges are justified. Too many are paying premium fees without getting premium returns. Some clients are reluctant to move entirely into traditional tracker funds. They want the low costs of passive investing, but with some active decision-making when market conditions change. That is where we are seeing growing demand for tactical asset allocation trackers. They combine passive efficiency with the flexibility to adjust allocations between regions, sectors and asset classes without the higher costs often associated with active management. For example, during a UK Prime Minister leadership challenge creating economic uncertainty, they can trim UK exposure and increase allocations elsewhere. A traditional tracker simply follows its index regardless. Many of these funds can form part, or even all, of a portfolio and are used by clients building pension wealth as well as those in retirement.
Star Quote
Copy

Clients are becoming more open to active management as market volatility rises. There is still strong demand for low-cost investing, but clients increasingly want managers who can make sensible adjustments rather than simply track markets through every shock. Active funds and tactical tracker strategies can both play a role, provided they are used carefully and costs are justified. They should sit within a diversified portfolio, not dominate it. Their value is in giving clients some flexibility when markets are moving quickly, while keeping a clear long-term plan in place. There is interest across age groups, though the reasons differ: younger clients want efficient growth, while older clients tend to be more focused on managing risk and avoiding unnecessary bumps.
Copy

Our clients aren’t asking for tactical trackers; they trust us to choose the right tools. We’re cautious about strategies claiming to sidestep market falls through tactical asset allocation. History suggests few consistently beat their benchmarks once costs are taken into account. However, certain rules-based ETFs can play a useful supporting role where they solve genuine portfolio construction issues, particularly the growing concentration within the S&P 500 in a handful of technology stocks. Used selectively alongside strategic asset allocation, they can improve diversification without abandoning long-term discipline. Suitability depends on investment objectives rather than age. Markets are good at surprising investors. Any strategy that depends on consistently predicting those surprises deserves a healthy dose of scepticism.
Copy

I am seeing more interest, but I would be careful with the label. A tactical tracker is not simply a cheap passive fund with a clever name. The value comes from using low-cost market exposure while allowing the manager to alter regional, sector, equity and bond weightings when the economic picture changes. That can be useful, particularly for clients who want a disciplined portfolio without paying active-management fees across every holding. But it should not become a licence to chase the next market narrative. Tactical decisions can add value; they can also add cost, turnover and the risk of being wrong at exactly the wrong time. For me, these funds are usually a satellite, not the entire portfolio. The core still needs to be built around the client’s time horizon, capacity for loss and objectives.