Copy article

LF quick comment from advisers on Octopus Investments suspending Octopus Inheritance Tax Service

Journalist: Laura Purkess, Freelance

ended 05. August 2026

After some adviser comments for Citywire on Octopus Investments suspending its Octopus Inheritance Tax Service withdrawals & applications as “Fern Trading, the underlying trading company in which OITS investors hold shares, is currently progressing a potential transaction involving part of its portfolio. As this process could materially affect Fern’s value, it is not currently possible to determine a fair and reliable share price."

What does this mean for investors / anyone who needs the money now? Is this the right move? Any other consequences? Thank you!

https://octopusinvestments.com/newsroom/temporary-oits-pause-to-applications-and-withdrawals/

 

2 responses from the Newspage community

Copy all

Copy

Suspending withdrawals from an inheritance tax planning product is not a comfortable message to send to investors who are, by the nature of the product, often elderly and time sensitive. Octopus is making the right call because trading while a potentially price sensitive transaction is in progress would be worse, but this episode exposes the liquidity assumption at the heart of all Business Property Relief products. They are inherently illiquid investments sold as an IHT solution, and when the market pauses, there is no secondary market to fall back on. Anyone affected should review their wider estate planning position now and not bank on the eight week timeline holding. Transactions have a habit of taking longer than the press release suggests.
Copy

This is not evidence that Fern has failed, but it is a sharp reminder that an unquoted investment is not a bank account. Investors needing cash now cannot withdraw from OITS while the pause remains in place, currently expected to last up to six to eight weeks, creating real pressure for anyone without sufficient cash reserves elsewhere.

In principle, pausing is the responsible move. Allowing investors to buy or sell using a valuation that may shortly prove wrong could unfairly benefit one group at another’s expense. However, the transaction could move Fern’s valuation either up or down, so investors should not assume this is merely administrative.

The wider consequence is a suitability and liquidity wake-up call. Business Relief may remain unaffected, but access is never guaranteed. Advisers should identify clients with planned withdrawals, explain the uncertainty clearly and review whether too much of their wealth depends on assets that cannot always be sold on demand.