Is inheritance tax now a middle-class problem?
The nil-rate band has remained fixed at £325,000 since 2009 and, although the residence nil-rate band was introduced in 2017, that too is now frozen. Over the same period, house prices and investment values have risen significantly.
On paper, that means more estates are being pulled into the inheritance tax net.
What was once seen as a tax on the very wealthy is increasingly affecting those with a family home and modest savings — particularly in areas where property values have grown strongly.
“Frozen thresholds and rising asset values are quietly dragging more families into scope, often without them realising,” says Chartered Financial Planner Scott Gallacher of Rowley Turton.
“The reality is that IHT is becoming a middle-class issue by stealth. Many families are being caught not because they’ve actively built significant wealth, but simply because asset values have risen over time.”
“For some, it comes as a genuine surprise. They don’t feel wealthy, yet their estate may face a 40% tax charge on part of their assets.”
This raises some important questions for advisers and tax experts:
- Are you seeing more ‘unexpected’ IHT cases — clients who wouldn’t have been exposed even five or ten years ago?
- To what extent is the family home now the main driver of IHT liability?
- Is IHT still widely misunderstood, particularly among middle-income families?
- Are clients engaging with planning early enough, or only once it’s too late to act effectively?
- Has fiscal drag fundamentally changed who this tax now affects in practice?
We’d be keen to hear whether inheritance tax is now firmly a middle-class issue — and how that is changing the advice clients need.






