Copy article

Advising clients to defer state pension

Journalist: Callum Mason, i

ended 23. September 2025

From next year, the state pension will climb very close to the personal allowance tax threshold. 

The year after it will rise above the threshold. I wondered if financial advisers were telling more clients who are working, or have high incomes and are approaching state pension age to defer their state pensions than they were doing four or five years ago?

Of course, doing so can cut tax bills, and ensure a higher state pension in the future?

5 responses from the Newspage community

Copy all

Copy

Deferring the state pension means giving up 100% of your pension for, say, a year in exchange for a higher payment later.

Before 2016, you received an uplift of 10.4% for each year deferred, so you only needed to live around 10 years to break even — and after that you were ahead. Since the Conservative–Liberal Democrat coalition slashed the rate to just 5.8% a year, you now need to live about 20 years to get your money back.

For most people, that’s simply not a good deal — there’s a real risk you’ll pass away before you ever benefit, or be too old or frail to enjoy the extra income. That said, deferral can still make sense for some very healthy individuals, or for higher-rate taxpayers who are still working and want to avoid unnecessary tax.
Copy

Deferring state pension is an option and it not only reduces the immediate tax drag but also enhances the eventual income received. That said, whether deferral is appropriate is highly individual. The decisions around retirement income should balance tax efficiency, longevity expectations, and behavioural comfort. While deferring gives a guaranteed uplift (around 5.8% per year under current rules), it only pays off if the client lives long enough to enjoy the higher payments. Health status, other income sources, and cashflow needs must all be factored in. For wealthier clients still working, deferral can be a very sensible way of avoiding an unnecessary tax liability while they don’t need the income. For those with limited resources, however, the immediate cashflow may outweigh the long-term actuarial benefit. So yes, I am highlighting deferral more than in the past, but the key is positioning it as one lever among many.
Copy

By deferring the pension for a year, you could get a higher pension but that comes at the price of not having the income for a year. With an uplift of roughly 5.8% a year, you could be looking at over 15 years to catch up compared to taking it at state pension age. There may be certain instances when this makes sense but it's not a strategy I've found useful.
Copy

Deferring the state pension is less attractive than it used to be.” Before April 2016, deferral was far more generous, with a 10.4% uplift per year and even a lump-sum option after 12 months. Today, the increase is just 5.8% a year, and with frozen personal allowances the state pension is now brushing against the tax threshold. For many still working, much of the uplift could simply be taxed away at 20%, 40% or even 45%. That’s why it’s vital to run the numbers and calculate the breakeven point under different assumptions. Often, the bigger decision is whether to spend and enjoy the money while you’re still fit and healthy at 67, rather than wait. For those with excess income, conversations frequently turn to gifting, either using the £3,000 annual exemption or making regular gifts out of income that fall outside the estate for inheritance tax. Deferral is no longer the obvious choice it once was it has to be judged case by case, based on personal circumstances and priorities.
Copy

It's a guaranteed, inflation proofed income and will stop when you die. I don't see many reasons for deferral. Sure, there's a minor uplift in deferral, however, I'd say claim it and spend or gift the income if you don't need it. Tomorrow isn't guaranteed.